This week I published a short essay in the ISA Newsletter on governance in the International Studies Association. In it, I explore a key independent variable that I hypothesize affects who serves in the entry-level leadership positions in sections, regions and caucuses: the process of electing chairs and the length of service required to serve in a chair role. I argue that a common practice of requiring potential chairs to serve first as program chairs–and conversely, for program chairs to immediately step into the top role–may preclude many qualified, interested members from serving in entry-level leadership. This essay was inspired by my own experience entering leadership in the International Education section, which merged two years ago with the Active Learning Section to form the Education and Learning in International Studies (ELIAS) section.
Find the full essay here: https://www.isanet.org/News/ID/6621/ISA-Section-Governance-Structures-Differences-in-Self-Governance-in-Sections-Caucuses-and-Regions
