Do you want to develop your scholarship profile and the impact of your work? Introducing the DARSHE* – an easy-to-use scholarship development tool. 

This guest post is brought to us by Rose Gann, Professor of Politics Education, and Julie Hulme, Professor of Psychology Education, both of Nottingham Trent University.

Are you interested in teaching and learning in Politics and International Relations and in using this work to develop your scholarship/academic profile? If yes, then the DARSHE framework might be of interest. My colleague (Prof Julie Hulme) and I recently undertook a project to map the ways in which academic staff within a large school of social sciences understand and practice scholarship (Gann & Hulme 2023). Through undertaking this project we realised; a) our colleagues often struggle to recognise their work as scholarship and b) they find debate around meaning and definitions of scholarship overly complex and unhelpful. Our solution was to come up with a tool – the DARSHE – Description of Activities Related to Scholarship in Higher Education (Gann & Hulme 2025) – that not only provides a simple visual guide to assist colleagues with identifying their work as scholarship but is broad enough to include diverse approaches, (and thus circumvent extensive debates about definitions of scholarship), as well as being able to help colleagues identify next steps to develop the reach and impact of their work. You can find the full text introducing the DARSHE here. Below is a quick introduction to the main ideas.

Continue reading “Do you want to develop your scholarship profile and the impact of your work? Introducing the DARSHE* – an easy-to-use scholarship development tool. “

May SoTL Roundup

Monthly SoTL roundup

We are back with the latest installment of the monthly SoTL roundup, wherein, each month (as the name implies), I’ll be scrolling through Journal of Political Studies Education, Politics, PS: Political Science & Politics, International Studies Perspectives, and European Political Science to bring to you, esteemed ALPS reader, the latest SoTL publications. 

Journal of Political Science Education

Hamerly, I. (2026). Enhancing Political Science Education: Evaluating the Impact of Networking Skills Training. Journal of Political Science Education, 1–6. 

Maranto, R., Bradley-Dorsey, M., & Bork, N. (2026). Political Science Majors Are More Tolerant of Controversial Speech. Journal of Political Science Education, 1–16.

O’Dell, R. K. M., & Minghini, S. E. (2026). Classroom UNSC Simulations for Building Student and Instructor Confidence, Leadership, and Negotiation Skills. Journal of Political Science Education, 1–18.

Continue reading “May SoTL Roundup”

GTA training: What is best practice in the UK?

This guest post comes to us from Dan Keith, Adam Fusco, and Chris Featherstone, all of the University of York’s Department of Politics and International Relations. This is the second in a five-part series that they are delivering, all on the important subject of training Graduate Teaching Assistants. You can read the first post in the series here.

Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs) make a valuable contribution to undergraduate education in UK politics programmes. They deliver a large number of teaching sessions – often seminars and workshops – and GTAs assess a significant volume of student work. GTAs can serve a crucial role in undergraduate student’s entry into the politics discipline. 

The benefits of providing robust training to GTAs are clear. It supports their confidence, boosts self-efficacy in classroom management, improves student engagement, and helps them to refine instructional strategies. Effective training also helps integrate GTAs into their departments, promoting a genuine ‘teaching community.’ However, despite this, there has been relatively little recent discussion about how Politics GTAs in the UK actually are—or should be—trained.

Different models for training GTAs have been recommended. These broadly fall into three categories:

Continue reading “GTA training: What is best practice in the UK?”

Call for abstracts! CPP x ASPIRE Conference

This year, UCL’s Centre for the Pedagogy of Politics and ASPIRE are co-hosting a one-day conference at UCL Bloomsbury Campus on 12th June. The call for abstracts is copied below, we’d love to see you there: 


It has been 20 years since Ishiyama, Breunig, and Lopez published ‘A Century of Continuity and (Little) Change in the Undergraduate Political Science Curriculum’ in the APSR, in which they discussed the ebbs and flows of academic attention to teaching and learning in our discipline. Since the publication of the piece, we have seen an inexorable rise in attention to, and innovations, within Politics and International Relations curricula; it is fair to say we are clearly in a state of some sustained ‘flow’.

Today, the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) in our field is a well-established subdiscipline, shaping how we conceptualise, innovate, deliver, and evaluate education. Moreover, curricula are markedly changed from those of two decades ago, with active learning and advances in assessment just some of the defining features of the contemporary Politics and International Relations classroom. Running alongside this transformation has been the growth of the education track: whilst this initially came about as a result of changing institutional financial and workload pressures, the education track has matured such that these posts are often held by colleagues deeply committed to advancing pedagogical practice and embedding educational innovation within the discipline.

In June, UCL’s Centre for the Pedagogy of Politics is teaming up with the ASPIRE network to host an event taking place at a pivotal moment in the ongoing transformation and development of education in our discipline. We invite papers, and / or panel proposals, around these themes:

  • How can we keep flowing and avoid the possibilities of ‘ebb’ that Ishiyama, Breunig, and Lopez warn of?
  • What are the unique perspectives and forms of expertise that education track colleagues can contribute to our discipline?
  • Does Politics and International Relations, with its attention to power and social change, imbue education track colleagues with a set of special skills for analysing (potential) changes to teaching and learning practices?
  • What are the existing areas in pedagogical scholarship on Politics and IR in need of further development? How can we address these areas and insufficiencies to facilitate the disciplinary flow ‘onwards and upwards’?

Please send submissions – in the form of abstracts of up to 300 words – to JP Salter (john-paul.salter@ucl.ac.uk) and Jeremy Moulton (jeremy.moulton@york.ac.uk) by 17th April 2026. Please also drop us an email if you wish to attend but not present (the more the merrier!).

April SoTL Roundup

Monthly SoTL roundup

We are back with the latest installment of the monthly SoTL roundup, wherein, each month (as the name implies), I’ll be scrolling through Journal of Political Studies Education, Politics, PS: Political Science & Politics, International Studies Perspectives, and European Political Science to bring to you, esteemed ALPS reader, the latest SoTL publications. 

I am compiling this month’s SoTL Roundup from Oxford, where I am attending the Political Studies Association’s 76th annual conference. There is some fantastic sounding SoTL on the programme for the conference, so, hopefully, there will be some great new publications to feature in the coming year. 

I also had the honour of chairing a roundtable on ‘Building a SoTL Culture’ on Monday, I’ll share something about that soon. But for now, let’s have a look at the latest SoTL in our beloved discipline:

Journal of Political Science Education

Fusco, A. (2026). Adopting Critical Reflections as an Assessment in Politics: Learning, Employability and the Value of a Political Education. Journal of Political Science Education, 1–17.

Continue reading “April SoTL Roundup”

A manifesto: Co-constructing contemporary climate change education

I am happy to share that I have new co-authored SoTL piece, published yesterday in the Journal of Environmental Education. This was a fun, interdisciplinary project that I undertook with Prof. Carolyn Snell, of York’s School of Business and Society and five fantastic undergraduate student partners.

The research began as an exploration of how we can make climate change education more inclusive, but quickly, after we heard the feedback from student partners, into a much broader piece of how we might want to make such education for engaging. The piece, drawing on that feedback, proposes a way forward to delivering a more engaging climate change education.

I will copy the abstract below, and would love to hear what people think!

Climate change is among the most urgent global challenges, yet Higher Education (HE) often provides climate change education (CCE) that is too narrow in focus and disconnected from students’ perspectives. This project, developed through staff–student partnership, examined mismatches between staff assumptions about teaching content, methods, and outcomes, and what students already know, value, and wish to learn. Contrary to expectations, students were less concerned with identity representation in CCE and more with aligning teaching to their interests and prior knowledge. In response, we co-constructed a framework for inclusive and engaging climate education, centered on iterative “climate change education manifestos.” These manifestos highlight shortcomings in current practice and articulate shared standards for improvement. While our project produced one manifesto, led by student partners, the proposal within this article is for such documents to serve as living tools that foster dialogue, adaptability, and co-construction of CCE, ultimately advancing inclusivity and meaningful engagement.

You can read the full piece here.

March SoTL Roundup

We are back with the latest instalment of the monthly SoTL roundup, wherein, each month (as the name implies), I’ll be scrolling through Journal of Political Studies Education, Politics, PS: Political Science & Politics, International Studies Perspectives, and European Political Science to bring to you, esteemed ALPS reader, the latest SoTL publications. 

Journal of Political Science Education

Bilhar, M., & Cook, R. J. (2026). What Would Mearsheimer Do? Reviewing Mearsheimer.ai as a Teaching Tool for International Relations. Journal of Political Science Education, 1–5. 

Knutson, K., & Flynn, R. (2026). What Am I Reading? How Teaching Genre Improves Civic Skills. Journal of Political Science Education, 1–17.

Continue reading “March SoTL Roundup”

ASPIRE SoTL Circle Episode 3

This guest post is brought to us by Dr. Jillian Terry. Jillian is an Associate Professor (Education) at the LSE, where she is Co-Director of the LSE100, LSE’s flagship interdisciplinary course. In this post, Jillian is reflecting on the ASPIRE Network’s latest SoTL Circle – a frequent event series where academics get together to discuss one piece of SoTL. If you would like to participate in an ASPIRE SoTL Circle, join the network and you will be invited to all future events.

This month, ASPIRE Network hosted our third SoTL Circle event, and I was happy to facilitate our discussion following the great examples set by my ASPIRE colleagues Jeremy Moulton and Madeleine Le Bourdon in our first two circles. For this iteration, we branched out from the confines of Political Science and International Relations, as I chose Aaron Stoller’s article “A Case for Critical Interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinarity as Democratic Education”, published in 2020 in Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies. The article makes some bold contentions about the value of interdisciplinary thinking for engaging students in education for deep democracy, and I hoped it would spark some interesting discussion amongst our community of teaching-focused Politics and IR scholars as we think about interdisciplinarity in our own teaching practice and the purpose of democratic education.

Continue reading “ASPIRE SoTL Circle Episode 3”

February SoTL Roundup

We are back with the next installment of the monthly SoTL roundup, wherein, each month (as the name implies), I’ll be scrolling through Journal of Political Studies Education, Politics, PS: Political Science & Politics, International Studies Perspectives, and European Political Science to bring to you, great ALPS reader, the latest SoTL publications.

Journal of Political Science Education

Block, R., Jr. (2026). The Classroom as Civic Sanctuary: Teaching, Learning, and the Emotional Labor of Democracy. Journal of Political Science Education, 1–9.

D’Orazio, D., Sammons, E., Reist, R., Jaipaul, N., & Auer, M. (2026). Teaching Training in Canadian Political Science PhD Programs. Journal of Political Science Education, 1–23. 

Deardorff, M. D. (2026). Finding Joy in Teaching During Dark Times. Journal of Political Science Education, 1–11.

Continue reading “February SoTL Roundup”

January SoTL Roundup

Happy New Year, all! We are back with our first SoTL Roundup of 2026. If you aren’t already familiar with the SoTL Roundup, each month (as the name implies), I’ll be scrolling through Journal of Political Studies Education, Politics, PS: Political Science & Politics, International Studies Perspectives, and European Political Science to bring to you, cherished ALPS reader, the latest SoTL publications. 

Journal of Political Science Education

Benzoni Baláž, M., & Hlavatá, L. (2025). Innovation: Let’s Co-Create the Rules to Get the Best Outcomes! Student as a Partner Approach in Creation of Assessment Criteria. Journal of Political Science Education, 1–18. 

Brake, B., & Bick, N. (2025). Using Short Simulations to Engage Students in Political Science Classrooms: A Redistricting Simulation in Two Different Settings. Journal of Political Science Education, 1–18. 

Continue reading “January SoTL Roundup”