Skip to content

Active Learning in Political Science ©

Made possible in part by Soomo Learning

Posted on July 29, 2016July 10, 2017 by craymond

Creating a Significant Learning Experience, Part 3

Mechanical System Blueprint

Here is the third installment of L. Dee Fink’s course design method. In this post I will be looking at final details.

How am I going to grade?

I am going to jump to a 2,000 point scale for calculating course grades, partly because of a new rubric for reading responses. I will also need to build rubrics for the activities related to game design. I will let students evaluate each other’s collaborative skills through the usual teammate evaluations.

By looking back at the primary components that I identified in Part 1, I can see that I forgot about the need to assess the civic engagement project. In the USA, most students won’t care about or complete tasks that are not graded.Maybe I should add a reflective writing assignment as a hook for the civic engagement.

What could go wrong?

I have taught the first-year seminar twice before, and I have a lot of experience with the techniques I plan on using for this course. I should be able to handle problems related to situational factors and instructional strategies. The civic engagement project is the big gray area; that is where my plans could really get derailed.

How will students learn about my plan for the course?

I have a lot of experience writing very detailed syllabi, and the new version of my syllabus quiz should force students to learn what to expect in the course. My rubrics make my grading criteria very transparent, at least in my mind.

How will I know if the course is going and went well?

Instead of relying upon my university’s student evaluation instrument, which lacks both reliability and validity, I use my own end-of-semester survey. I will need to rewrite the survey’s questions to reflect the specific learning goals I have established for this course. It would probably be wise to also collect feedback at mid-semester using the same questions.

Another indicator of students’ experiences of the course is their performance on assignments. Motivated students perform better than those who never engage, and this is reflected in the grades students earn.

The design of the course is now complete. 

. . . Full list of links to the entire series:

Review of Creating Significant Learning Experiences

Creating a Significant Learning Experience, Part 1

Creating a Significant Learning Experience, Part 2

Creating a Significant Learning Experience, Part 3

CategoriesAssessment and Exams, Assignments, Chad Raymond Tagscommunity and civic engagement

Post navigation

Previous PostPrevious Talking at cross-purposes
Next PostNext Pokepolisci

Search

Subscribe via RSS

Pages

  • About ALPS
  • ALPS Workshops
  • Higher Ed
  • Simulation and Game Index

Categories

  • Academia (610)
  • Activities and Exercises (711)
  • AI (26)
  • Amanda Rosen (199)
  • American Politics (54)
  • Assessment and Exams (208)
  • Assignments (186)
  • Awards (2)
  • Cathy Elliott (21)
  • Chad Raymond (729)
  • Citizenship (3)
  • Cognitive Science and Psychology (56)
  • Comparative Politics (133)
  • Conferences (12)
  • Economics (60)
  • Education-focused careers (11)
  • Embodiment in the classroom (8)
  • Emotions and teaching (13)
  • Environmental Politics (42)
  • Events (21)
  • Game Reviews (25)
  • Grades and Marking (14)
  • Graduate Training (6)
  • Guest post (58)
  • In the Classroom (64)
  • International Relations (158)
  • J-P Salter (4)
  • James Fielder (22)
  • Jennifer Ostojski (37)
  • Jeremy Moulton (53)
  • Joy of teaching (20)
  • Leanne Powner (23)
  • Literature (4)
  • Michelle Allendoerfer (51)
  • Module evaluations (1)
  • Multicultural-International-Global (83)
  • Nina Kollars (44)
  • Object Based Learning (2)
  • Office Hours (4)
  • Online Teaching (121)
  • Outdoor learning (5)
  • Peace and Conflict (30)
  • Pedagogies of care (16)
  • Podcasts (7)
  • Political Theory (39)
  • Programme design (4)
  • Public Policy (23)
  • Relational pedagogy (4)
  • Research Methods (98)
  • Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (59)
  • Simon Usherwood (615)
  • Simulations and Games (336)
  • SoTL Roundup (11)
  • Supervision (2)
  • Teaching Skills (18)
  • Technology (20)
  • Tools (9)
  • UCL Centre for the Pedagogy of Politics (36)
  • Uncategorized (29)
  • Victor Asal (25)
  • Voting and Elections (23)

Tags

  • #AI
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • bookshelf
  • classroom behavior
  • classroom games
  • class size
  • collaboration
  • community and civic engagement
  • conferences
  • critical thinking
  • curriculum
  • design
  • digital visual or social media
  • Europe
  • European Union
  • events
  • failure
  • feedback and reflection
  • fiction and film
  • flipped classroom
  • guest posts
  • incentivizing student reading
  • information literacy
  • ISA
  • journals
  • Latin America-Caribbean
  • Middle East
  • online games
  • political theory
  • presentations
  • problem solving
  • projects
  • role play
  • rubrics
  • scholarship of teaching and learning
  • simulations
  • student participation
  • teaching tools
  • technology
  • UCL Centre for the Pedagogy of Politics
  • UK
  • women
  • workshops
  • writing

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
    Proudly powered by WordPress