Skip to content

Active Learning in Political Science ©

Made possible in part by Soomo Learning

Posted on July 17, 2016July 10, 2017 by craymond

Creating a Significant Learning Experience, Part 2

Here is the second installment of using L. Dee Fink’s method of course design. In the first installment, I ran through the first phase of the process, identifying primary components. Now I’ll be assembling those components into a coherent whole by aligning the course’s schedule and topics with what students will be doing.

What topics will I introduce? (thematic structure)

I am using travel as a unifying theme that introduces students to:

  • Identity politics.
  • Personal transformation.
  • Conflict, prejudice, and injustice.
  • Global interconnectedness.

What will students need to do? (instructional strategies)

  • Reading responses: read — write — discuss — write.
  • Short analytical papers to gain background knowledge for each of three games spaced throughout the semester: read — write.
  • Game design: collaborate — create — evaluate.
  • Meta-cognitive assignments that bookend the semester: reflect — write.
  • Civic engagement project: listen — communicate  — collaborate — write.

What is the overall scheme of learning activities?

This step integrates the selected instructional strategies with the course’s schedule. Fink provides a handy diagram for laying this out visually (p. 261) that is divided into in-class and out-of-class activities. I will describe my organizational plan rather than trying to reproduce the diagram here:

  • Students read and write outside of class three times per week, for a period of several weeks. In class, they discuss what they have written. I might test them to motivate them to take handwritten notes on readings and discussions.
  • At three points in the semester, each student completes a writing assignment outside of class to prepare them for game design. In class, they work in teams to design a game, then they play the games designed by other teams and evaluate them. This process will occur over several class periods and will overlap with the activities related to the reading responses.
  • The civic engagement project, if it happens, will involve trips to a community center on three Saturdays during the first half of the semester. One-third of the class will go on each trip. I’m thinking that this justifies canceling class the day before, but I will keep the deadlines for the reading responses on those days unchanged.
  • The knowledge plan is due at the close of the add-drop period at the beginning of the semester and the quality of failure essay is due the day after classes end.

My next post will look at the final phase of course design — taking care of important details.

. . . Full list of links to the entire series:

Review of Creating Significant Learning Experiences

Creating a Significant Learning Experience, Part 1

Creating a Significant Learning Experience, Part 2

Creating a Significant Learning Experience, Part 3

CategoriesAssessment and Exams, Assignments, Chad Raymond Tagscommunity and civic engagement

Post navigation

Previous PostPrevious Academic Controversy
Next PostNext Silly questions

Search

Subscribe via RSS

Pages

  • About ALPS
  • ALPS Workshops
  • Higher Ed
  • Simulation and Game Index

Categories

  • Academia (610)
  • Activities and Exercises (711)
  • AI (26)
  • Amanda Rosen (199)
  • American Politics (54)
  • Assessment and Exams (208)
  • Assignments (186)
  • Awards (2)
  • Cathy Elliott (21)
  • Chad Raymond (729)
  • Citizenship (3)
  • Cognitive Science and Psychology (56)
  • Comparative Politics (133)
  • Conferences (12)
  • Economics (60)
  • Education-focused careers (11)
  • Embodiment in the classroom (8)
  • Emotions and teaching (13)
  • Environmental Politics (42)
  • Events (21)
  • Game Reviews (25)
  • Grades and Marking (14)
  • Graduate Training (6)
  • Guest post (58)
  • In the Classroom (64)
  • International Relations (158)
  • J-P Salter (4)
  • James Fielder (22)
  • Jennifer Ostojski (37)
  • Jeremy Moulton (54)
  • Joy of teaching (20)
  • Leanne Powner (23)
  • Literature (4)
  • Michelle Allendoerfer (51)
  • Module evaluations (1)
  • Multicultural-International-Global (83)
  • Nina Kollars (44)
  • Object Based Learning (2)
  • Office Hours (4)
  • Online Teaching (121)
  • Outdoor learning (5)
  • Peace and Conflict (30)
  • Pedagogies of care (16)
  • Podcasts (7)
  • Political Theory (39)
  • Programme design (4)
  • Public Policy (23)
  • Relational pedagogy (4)
  • Research Methods (98)
  • Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (60)
  • Simon Usherwood (615)
  • Simulations and Games (336)
  • SoTL Roundup (12)
  • Supervision (2)
  • Teaching Skills (18)
  • Technology (20)
  • Tools (9)
  • UCL Centre for the Pedagogy of Politics (36)
  • Uncategorized (29)
  • Victor Asal (25)
  • Voting and Elections (23)

Tags

  • #AI
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • bookshelf
  • classroom behavior
  • classroom games
  • class size
  • collaboration
  • community and civic engagement
  • conferences
  • critical thinking
  • curriculum
  • design
  • digital visual or social media
  • Europe
  • European Union
  • events
  • failure
  • feedback and reflection
  • fiction and film
  • flipped classroom
  • guest posts
  • incentivizing student reading
  • information literacy
  • ISA
  • journals
  • Latin America-Caribbean
  • Middle East
  • online games
  • political theory
  • presentations
  • problem solving
  • projects
  • role play
  • rubrics
  • scholarship of teaching and learning
  • simulations
  • student participation
  • teaching tools
  • technology
  • UCL Centre for the Pedagogy of Politics
  • UK
  • women
  • workshops
  • writing

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
    Proudly powered by WordPress